Can more than one model be applied during the machine learning process?

/ / Published in Artificial Intelligence, EITC/AI/GCML Google Cloud Machine Learning, First steps in Machine Learning, The 7 steps of machine learning

The question of whether more than one model can be applied during the machine learning process is highly pertinent, especially within the practical context of real-world data analysis and predictive modeling. The application of multiple models is not only feasible but is also a widely endorsed practice in both research and industry. This approach arises naturally during the model selection and evaluation phases and serves numerous purposes, such as comparison, improvement of prediction accuracy, and robust deployment strategies.

The canonical seven steps of machine learning—problem definition, data acquisition, data exploration and preprocessing, feature engineering, model selection, model training, and model evaluation—are structured to accommodate the experimentation with multiple models. In the step dedicated to model selection, practitioners are encouraged to consider a diverse set of model families, which may include linear regression, decision trees, ensemble methods, neural networks, clustering algorithms, or others, depending on the nature of the task (regression, classification, clustering, etc.).

Rationale for Applying Multiple Models

1. Comparative Analysis:
Different machine learning algorithms have varying strengths, assumptions, and inductive biases. For instance, a logistic regression model assumes linear separability and may underperform when the true relationship is nonlinear. Conversely, decision trees can capture complex nonlinearities but are prone to overfitting. By applying several models, practitioners can empirically determine which algorithm best fits the data for the problem at hand.

2. Bias-Variance Trade-off:
Each model type exhibits a different balance between bias and variance. For example, simple models like linear regression often have high bias and low variance, while more complex models such as deep neural networks have low bias but high variance. Experimenting with multiple models allows for a more nuanced selection that considers this trade-off in the context of the observed data.

3. Feature Sensitivity:
Some models are more robust to irrelevant or redundant features (e.g., regularized linear models like Lasso), while others are sensitive to feature scaling and distribution. Applying various models during the selection phase enables the detection of which modeling approaches are more compatible with the engineered features or which may require further feature engineering.

Implementation in Google Cloud Machine Learning

Google Cloud provides a suite of tools and managed services to facilitate the use of multiple models. For example, within AI Platform (now Vertex AI), one can train different models in parallel, track experiments, and compare their evaluation metrics systematically. This infrastructure supports the best practices of model experimentation and selection.

Practical Example 1: Predictive Maintenance

Suppose a company wants to predict machine failures using sensor data. The steps might include:

– Data Preparation: Gather sensor logs, preprocess to handle missing values, and engineer features such as rolling averages or anomaly scores.
– Model Selection: The data scientist could train a logistic regression for interpretability, a random forest for capturing nonlinear relationships, and a gradient boosting machine for potential performance gains.
– Model Evaluation: Each model is evaluated using cross-validation and metrics such as the area under the ROC curve (AUC). The best-performing model is selected based on a balance of accuracy, interpretability, and computational efficiency.

Practical Example 2: Sentiment Analysis

In a text classification task, such as predicting sentiment from customer reviews, practitioners might compare:

– A support vector machine (SVM) with bag-of-words features,
– A convolutional neural network (CNN) with word embeddings,
– A transformer-based model such as BERT.

By applying and comparing these models, it’s possible to determine which approach delivers the highest accuracy, fastest inference, or best generalization to unseen data.

Advanced Strategies: Model Ensembling and Stacking

Beyond the selection of a single best model, combining multiple models can lead to improved performance. Ensemble techniques such as bagging (e.g., random forests) and boosting (e.g., XGBoost, LightGBM) aggregate the predictions of numerous base models to reduce variance or bias. In stacking, diverse models are trained on the same dataset, and their outputs are used as inputs to a meta-model, which attempts to learn how to best combine the predictions.

For instance, in Kaggle competitions and production-grade deployments, stacking and blending have become standard practices for maximizing predictive accuracy and robustness.

Model Diversity for Robustness and Fairness

Another motivation for applying multiple models is to assess consistency and fairness. Different algorithms may exhibit distinct biases in relation to subgroups within the data. By comparing model outputs, practitioners can identify and mitigate unintended biases, thereby ensuring more equitable and reliable outcomes.

Operational Considerations

When deploying machine learning models in production, organizations might use multiple models for:

– Model A/B Testing: Deploying two or more models to subsets of users to measure real-world performance differences.
– Champion-Challenger Paradigm: Running a champion model (current production model) alongside one or more challenger models to monitor whether the challengers outperform the champion before considering a switch.
– Fallback Mechanisms: Utilizing simpler models alongside complex ones as fallbacks in case of latency or resource constraints.

Automated Machine Learning (AutoML)

Google Cloud’s AutoML and similar tools automate the process of training and evaluating multiple models. Under the hood, these platforms systematically try out various algorithms, data transformations, and hyperparameter settings, selecting the best model based on objective metrics.

Hyperparameter Optimization

While the question focuses on using different model types, it is important to mention that extensive experimentation is often conducted even within a single model family. For example, tuning the depth of a decision tree or the learning rate of a neural network can lead to functionally different models. Modern platforms support automated hyperparameter search, further encouraging the exploration of multiple models.

Documentation and Reproducibility

Applying multiple models mandates rigorous experiment tracking. Tools such as TensorBoard, Weights & Biases, and Google Cloud Vertex AI Experiments allow for systematic documentation of which models were tried, with which parameters, on which data splits, and with what results. This practice is vital for reproducibility, collaboration, and regulatory compliance.

Caveats and Best Practices

– Overfitting to Validation Data: Trying too many models can lead to overfitting on validation sets. Proper cross-validation and, ideally, a held-out test set are necessary to estimate real-world performance accurately.
– Computational Resources: Training, tuning, and evaluating many models can be resource-intensive. Cloud platforms provide scalable infrastructure, but cost and time management remain important.
– Interpretability vs. Performance: More complex or ensemble models can be harder to interpret. In regulated industries, a trade-off might exist between transparency and predictive power.

Didactic Value

Introducing students or practitioners to the concept of applying multiple models provides several pedagogical benefits:

1. Comprehensive Understanding: Learners develop a deeper appreciation for the diversity of algorithms and their fit to different problem contexts.
2. Empirical Mindset: Rather than assuming one model will always be optimal, learners are encouraged to test hypotheses and ground decisions in experimental results.
3. Critical Evaluation: By comparing strengths and weaknesses across algorithms, learners cultivate analytical skills that are transferable to other domains.

For students, exercises that involve training and evaluating multiple models foster hands-on experience with the iterative, empirical nature of machine learning. They also offer insights into practical limitations, such as computational efficiency, scalability, and the importance of hyperparameter tuning.

The practice of applying more than one model lies at the heart of effective machine learning workflows. It is supported by sound statistical reasoning, operational needs, and the growing body of tools that make such experimentation accessible and manageable at scale. Whether for research, prototyping, or deployment, evaluating multiple models is standard and recommended for achieving reliable, performant, and equitable solutions.

Other recent questions and answers regarding EITC/AI/GCML Google Cloud Machine Learning:

View more questions and answers in EITC/AI/GCML Google Cloud Machine Learning

More questions and answers:

Tagged under: , , , , , , , , ,