In the realm of quantum computation, the Controlled-NOT (CNOT) gate plays a pivotal role in entangling qubits, which are the fundamental units of quantum information processing. The entanglement phenomenon, famously described by Schrödinger as "entanglement is not a property of one system but a property of the relationship between two or more systems," is a cornerstone of quantum mechanics and a key resource for quantum computation.
When a CNOT gate is applied to qubits, its action depends on the state of the control qubit. If the control qubit is in a superposition of states, the CNOT gate operates on a superposition of applying and not applying a quantum negation to the target qubit. This superposition of operations leads to a unique feature of quantum computation: the potential for entanglement between qubits.
The entanglement induced by the CNOT gate when the control qubit is in a superposition arises from the entangling nature of the gate itself. In classical computation, operations are deterministic and do not exhibit the superposition and entanglement characteristics of quantum operations. However, in quantum computation, the probabilistic nature of superposition allows for the creation of entangled states that have no classical analog.
To illustrate this concept, let's consider a simple example involving two qubits, qubit A (control qubit) and qubit B (target qubit). Initially, qubit A is in a superposition of states |0⟩ and |1⟩, while qubit B is in state |0⟩. When a CNOT gate is applied with qubit A as the control qubit and qubit B as the target qubit, the resulting entangled state is a superposition of both qubits being in states |00⟩ and |11⟩. This entangled state cannot be expressed as a product of individual qubit states, highlighting the unique nature of entanglement in quantum systems.
The application of a CNOT gate with a control qubit in a superposition can indeed introduce entanglement between qubits, showcasing the distinctive capabilities of quantum computation in leveraging superposition and entanglement for information processing tasks.
Other recent questions and answers regarding Conclusions from reversible computation:
- Is the copying of the C(x) bits in contradiction with the no cloning theorem?
- What is the significance of the theorem that any classical circuit can be converted into a corresponding quantum circuit?
- How can the desired output be preserved while eliminating junk in a reversible circuit?
- What is the purpose of applying the inverse circuit in reversible computation?
- Why is throwing away junk qubits not a viable solution to the problem?
- How does the presence of junk qubits in quantum computation prevent quantum interference?