In the context of QAOA, how do the cost Hamiltonian and mixing Hamiltonian contribute to exploring the solution space, and what are their typical forms for the Max-Cut problem?

/ / Published in Artificial Intelligence, EITC/AI/TFQML TensorFlow Quantum Machine Learning, Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA), Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) with Tensorflow Quantum, Examination review

The Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) is a hybrid quantum-classical algorithm designed to solve combinatorial optimization problems, leveraging the principles of quantum mechanics. It is particularly notable for its application in problems like Max-Cut, where the goal is to partition the vertices of a graph such that the number of edges between the two sets is maximized. The QAOA operates by iteratively applying a sequence of quantum gates parameterized by classical parameters to explore and optimize the solution space. Central to the QAOA are two types of Hamiltonians: the cost Hamiltonian and the mixing Hamiltonian. These Hamiltonians play important roles in navigating the solution space and achieving an optimal or near-optimal solution.

Cost Hamiltonian (H_C)

The cost Hamiltonian, H_C, encodes the objective function of the optimization problem. For the Max-Cut problem, the objective is to maximize the number of edges between two partitions of the graph. The cost Hamiltonian is constructed in such a way that its ground state (the state with the lowest energy) corresponds to the optimal solution of the problem.

Form of the Cost Hamiltonian for Max-Cut

For a given graph G = (V, E) with vertices V and edges E, the cost Hamiltonian for the Max-Cut problem is typically expressed as:

    \[ H_C = \sum_{(i,j) \in E} \frac{1}{2} (1 - Z_i Z_j) \]

Here, Z_i and Z_j are Pauli-Z operators acting on qubits i and j, respectively. Each term \frac{1}{2} (1 - Z_i Z_j) contributes to the Hamiltonian if the qubits i and j are in different states (i.e., they are in different partitions of the graph). The factor \frac{1}{2} ensures proper scaling of the energy contribution.

Mixing Hamiltonian (H_M)

The mixing Hamiltonian, H_M, is responsible for introducing quantum superpositions and entanglement into the system, thereby enabling the exploration of the solution space. It ensures that the algorithm does not get stuck in local minima by allowing transitions between different states.

Form of the Mixing Hamiltonian

The mixing Hamiltonian is typically chosen to be:

    \[ H_M = \sum_{i \in V} X_i \]

where X_i is the Pauli-X operator acting on qubit i. The Pauli-X operator acts as a bit-flip, changing the state of the qubit from |0\rangle to |1\rangle and vice versa. This Hamiltonian promotes transitions between different configurations of the qubits, allowing the algorithm to explore various possible solutions.

QAOA Algorithm Procedure

The QAOA algorithm proceeds through the following steps:

1. Initialization: Start with an initial quantum state, typically the uniform superposition state:

    \[ |\psi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2^n}} \sum_{z \in \{0,1\}^n} |z\rangle \]

2. Application of Cost Hamiltonian: Apply the cost Hamiltonian H_C for a time \gamma:

    \[ |\psi_1\rangle = e^{-i \gamma H_C} |\psi_0\rangle \]

3. Application of Mixing Hamiltonian: Apply the mixing Hamiltonian H_M for a time \beta:

    \[ |\psi_2\rangle = e^{-i \beta H_M} |\psi_1\rangle \]

4. Iterative Process: Repeat the above two steps p times, where p is the depth of the QAOA circuit. The final state after p iterations is:

    \[ |\psi(\vec{\gamma}, \vec{\beta})\rangle = \prod_{k=1}^{p} e^{-i \beta_k H_M} e^{-i \gamma_k H_C} |\psi_0\rangle \]

5. Measurement: Measure the final state in the computational basis to obtain a bitstring representing a candidate solution.

6. Classical Optimization: Use a classical optimization algorithm to find the optimal parameters \vec{\gamma} and \vec{\beta} that maximize the expectation value of the cost Hamiltonian:

    \[ \langle \psi(\vec{\gamma}, \vec{\beta}) | H_C | \psi(\vec{\gamma}, \vec{\beta}) \rangle \]

Example: Max-Cut on a Simple Graph

Consider a simple graph with 3 vertices and 3 edges forming a triangle. The vertices are labeled as 1, 2, and 3, and the edges are (1,2), (2,3), and (3,1).

Cost Hamiltonian

The cost Hamiltonian for this graph is:

    \[ H_C = \frac{1}{2} (1 - Z_1 Z_2) + \frac{1}{2} (1 - Z_2 Z_3) + \frac{1}{2} (1 - Z_3 Z_1) \]

Mixing Hamiltonian

The mixing Hamiltonian is:

    \[ H_M = X_1 + X_2 + X_3 \]

TensorFlow Quantum Implementation

In TensorFlow Quantum, the QAOA can be implemented using the `cirq` and `tfq` libraries. Below is a high-level outline of how to set up and run QAOA for the Max-Cut problem on the aforementioned graph:

1. Define the Graph:

python
   import networkx as nx
   import cirq
   import tensorflow_quantum as tfq

   # Define the graph
   G = nx.Graph()
   G.add_edges_from([(0, 1), (1, 2), (2, 0)])

2. Create Qubits and Circuit:

python
   qubits = cirq.GridQubit.rect(1, 3)
   circuit = cirq.Circuit()

3. Apply QAOA Gates:

python
   # Define the cost and mixing Hamiltonians
   cost_hamiltonian = sum(0.5 * (1 - cirq.Z(qubits[i]) * cirq.Z(qubits[j])) for i, j in G.edges)
   mixing_hamiltonian = sum(cirq.X(qubits[i]) for i in range(len(qubits)))

   # Apply the QAOA circuit
   p = 1  # Depth of the QAOA circuit
   gamma = sympy.Symbol('gamma')
   beta = sympy.Symbol('beta')

   for _ in range(p):
       circuit += cirq.Circuit(cirq.H.on_each(*qubits))
       circuit += cirq.Circuit(cirq.ZZ(qubits[i], qubits[j])**gamma for i, j in G.edges)
       circuit += cirq.Circuit(cirq.X(qubits[i])**beta for i in range(len(qubits)))

4. Create Quantum Model:

python
   # Create the quantum model
   readout_operators = [cost_hamiltonian]
   model = tfq.layers.PQC(circuit, readout_operators)

5. Train the Model:

python
   # Prepare the training data
   input_data = tfq.convert_to_tensor([cirq.Circuit()])
   y_train = np.array([0.0])

   # Compile and train the model
   model.compile(optimizer=tf.keras.optimizers.Adam(learning_rate=0.01), loss=tf.keras.losses.MeanSquaredError())
   model.fit(input_data, y_train, epochs=100)

This implementation provides a foundational structure for running QAOA using TensorFlow Quantum. The parameters \gamma and \beta are optimized classically to maximize the expectation value of the cost Hamiltonian, effectively guiding the quantum state towards the optimal solution.

The cost Hamiltonian and mixing Hamiltonian are integral to the QAOA's ability to explore the solution space. The cost Hamiltonian encodes the problem's objective function, while the mixing Hamiltonian facilitates transitions between different states, preventing the algorithm from becoming trapped in local minima. By iteratively applying these Hamiltonians and optimizing the parameters, QAOA can efficiently navigate the solution space and find optimal or near-optimal solutions to combinatorial optimization problems such as Max-Cut.

Other recent questions and answers regarding EITC/AI/TFQML TensorFlow Quantum Machine Learning:

View more questions and answers in EITC/AI/TFQML TensorFlow Quantum Machine Learning

More questions and answers:

Tagged under: , , , , ,