Symmetric cryptography and asymmetric cryptography are two fundamental concepts in the field of cryptography. They are distinct in terms of their underlying principles, key management, and use cases.
Symmetric cryptography, also known as secret key cryptography, employs a single key for both encryption and decryption processes. The same key is used by both the sender and the receiver to encrypt and decrypt the message, respectively. This key must be kept secret to ensure the confidentiality of the communication. The primary advantage of symmetric cryptography is its efficiency in terms of computational resources and speed. It is particularly suitable for securing large amounts of data, such as bulk data transfers or secure storage.
To illustrate, let's consider an example where Alice wants to send a confidential message to Bob using symmetric cryptography. They agree on a secret key beforehand and Alice uses this key to encrypt the message. She then sends the encrypted message to Bob, who uses the same key to decrypt and read the original message. As long as the key remains secret, the communication remains secure.
On the other hand, asymmetric cryptography, also known as public key cryptography, employs a pair of mathematically related keys: a public key and a private key. The public key is widely distributed and used for encryption, while the private key is kept secret and used for decryption. This key pair is generated in such a way that it is computationally infeasible to derive the private key from the public key. Asymmetric cryptography provides several security features, including confidentiality, integrity, authentication, and non-repudiation.
Let's consider another example to illustrate the use of asymmetric cryptography. Suppose Alice wants to send a confidential message to Bob, and they both have a key pair consisting of a public key and a private key. Alice uses Bob's public key to encrypt the message, and Bob uses his private key to decrypt it. In this scenario, even if the encrypted message is intercepted by an adversary, they would not be able to decrypt it without Bob's private key. This ensures the confidentiality of the communication.
Asymmetric cryptography also enables other important functionalities, such as digital signatures. In this case, the sender uses their private key to sign a message, and the receiver can verify the authenticity of the message using the sender's public key. This provides integrity and non-repudiation, as the digital signature can only be generated with the sender's private key.
Symmetric cryptography uses a single shared key for encryption and decryption, while asymmetric cryptography uses a pair of mathematically related keys: a public key for encryption and a private key for decryption. Symmetric cryptography is efficient for securing large amounts of data, while asymmetric cryptography provides additional security features such as confidentiality, integrity, authentication, and non-repudiation.
Other recent questions and answers regarding EITC/IS/CCF Classical Cryptography Fundamentals:
- Does the GSM system implement its stream cipher using Linear Feedback Shift Registers?
- Did Rijndael cipher win a competition call by NIST to become the AES cryptosystem?
- What is the public-key cryptography (asymmetric cryptography)?
- What is a brute force attack?
- Can we tell how many irreducible polynomial exist for GF(2^m) ?
- Can two different inputs x1, x2 produce the same output y in Data Encryption Standard (DES)?
- Why in FF GF(8) irreducible polynomial itself does not belong to the same field?
- At the stage of S-boxes in DES since we are reducing fragment of a message by 50% is there a guarantee we don’t loose data and message stays recoverable / decryptable?
- With an attack on a single LFSR is it possible to encounter combination of encrypted and decrypted part of the transmission of length 2m from which it is not possible to build solvable linear equations system?
- In case of an attack on a single LFSR, if attackers capture 2m bits from the middle of transmission (message) can they still calculate configuration of the LSFR (values of p) and can they decrypt in backwards direction?
View more questions and answers in EITC/IS/CCF Classical Cryptography Fundamentals