The recursion theorem plays a crucial role in enabling a Turing machine to compute its own description. In the field of computational complexity theory, understanding this theorem is fundamental to grasping the intricacies of recursion and its applications in the context of Turing machines. This answer aims to provide a detailed and comprehensive explanation of the recursion theorem, highlighting its didactic value and factual knowledge.

To comprehend how the recursion theorem empowers a Turing machine to compute its own description, it is essential to first understand the concept of recursion. Recursion refers to the ability of a function or procedure to call itself during its execution. This powerful technique allows for the creation of elegant and efficient algorithms, as it enables the solution of complex problems by breaking them down into smaller, more manageable subproblems.

In the context of Turing machines, the recursion theorem establishes a remarkable connection between computations and descriptions of Turing machines. It states that for any Turing machine M and input x, there exists a description d of a Turing machine that, when executed on input d, will produce the same result as M on input x. In simpler terms, the recursion theorem guarantees the existence of a Turing machine that can simulate the behavior of any other Turing machine on any given input.

The recursion theorem is formally stated as follows: Let Φ be a function that maps descriptions of Turing machines to their corresponding outputs. Then, there exists a Turing machine R such that for any description d and input x, R(d, x) halts if and only if Φ(d)(x) halts, and R(d, x) outputs the same result as Φ(d)(x).

To illustrate the practical implications of the recursion theorem, consider a scenario where we have a Turing machine M that takes as input a description of another Turing machine and determines whether the latter halts on a specific input. Without the recursion theorem, it would be challenging for M to compute its own description and reason about its own behavior. However, with the recursion theorem, M can effectively simulate itself by constructing a new Turing machine R that takes as input a description d and an input x, and then executes the same steps as M on input x. By utilizing the recursion theorem, M can compute its own description and make decisions based on its own behavior.

The didactic value of the recursion theorem lies in its ability to demonstrate the power and versatility of recursion in the context of Turing machines. By establishing a connection between computations and descriptions, the recursion theorem sheds light on the deep relationship between algorithms and their representations. It showcases the potential for self-reference and self-simulation within the framework of Turing machines, paving the way for more advanced concepts and applications in computational complexity theory.

The recursion theorem is a fundamental concept in the field of computational complexity theory, particularly in the context of Turing machines. It enables a Turing machine to compute its own description by establishing a connection between computations and descriptions. Through the power of recursion, a Turing machine can simulate itself and reason about its own behavior. The didactic value of the recursion theorem lies in its ability to showcase the potential for self-reference and self-simulation within the realm of Turing machines.

#### Other recent questions and answers regarding EITC/IS/CCTF Computational Complexity Theory Fundamentals:

- Is Chomsky’s grammar normal form always decidible?
- Can a regular expression be defined using recursion?
- How to represent OR as FSM?
- Is there a contradiction between the definition of NP as a class of decision problems with polynomial-time verifiers and the fact that problems in the class P also have polynomial-time verifiers?
- Is verifier for class P polynomial?
- Can a Nondeterministic Finite Automaton (NFA) be used to represent the state transitions and actions in a firewall configuration?
- Is using three tapes in a multitape TN equivalent to single tape time t2(square) or t3(cube)? In other words is the time complexity directly related to number of tapes?
- If the value in the fixed point definition is the lim of the repeated application of the function can we call it still a fixed point? In the example shown if instead of 4->4 we have 4->3.9, 3.9->3.99, 3.99->3.999, … is 4 still the fixed point?
- If we have two TMs that describe a decidable language is the equivalence question still undecidable?
- In the case of detecting the start of the tape, can we start by using a new tape T1=$T instead of shifting to the right?

View more questions and answers in EITC/IS/CCTF Computational Complexity Theory Fundamentals