Can a problem be in NP complexity class if there is a non deterministic turing machine that will solve it in polynomial time
The question "Can a problem be in NP complexity class if there is a non-deterministic Turing machine that will solve it in polynomial time?" touches upon fundamental concepts in computational complexity theory. To address this question comprehensively, we must consider the definitions and characteristics of the NP complexity class and the role of non-deterministic Turing machines (NDTMs).
Definition of NP
The class NP (nondeterministic polynomial time) consists of decision problems for which a given solution can be verified as correct or incorrect in polynomial time by a deterministic Turing machine (DTM). Formally, a decision problem is in NP if there exists a polynomial-time verification algorithm that can verify the correctness of a given certificate (or witness) for an instance of the problem.
Non-Deterministic Turing Machines
A non-deterministic Turing machine is a theoretical model of computation that extends the capabilities of a deterministic Turing machine. Unlike a DTM, which follows a single computational path defined by its transition function, an NDTM can pursue multiple computational paths simultaneously. At each step, an NDTM can "choose" from a set of possible transitions, effectively exploring many possible computations in parallel.
Polynomial-Time Solvability by NDTMs
A problem is said to be solvable by an NDTM in polynomial time if there exists a non-deterministic algorithm that can find a solution to the problem within a number of steps that is polynomial in the size of the input. This means that for any instance of the problem, the NDTM can explore a computational path that leads to a solution in polynomial time.
Relationship Between NP and NDTMs
The class NP can be equivalently defined in terms of NDTMs. Specifically, a decision problem is in NP if and only if there exists an NDTM that can solve the problem in polynomial time. This equivalence arises from the fact that an NDTM can guess a certificate non-deterministically and then verify it deterministically in polynomial time.
To illustrate this with an example, consider the well-known NP-complete problem, the Boolean satisfiability problem (SAT). Given a Boolean formula in conjunctive normal form (CNF), the task is to determine whether there exists an assignment of truth values to the variables that makes the formula true. An NDTM can solve SAT in polynomial time by non-deterministically guessing an assignment of truth values and then deterministically checking if the assignment satisfies the formula. The verification step, which involves evaluating the formula under the guessed assignment, can be done in polynomial time.
Implications of Polynomial-Time Solvability by NDTMs
Given the above definitions and the equivalence between NP and polynomial-time solvability by NDTMs, we can conclude that if there exists an NDTM that solves a problem in polynomial time, then the problem is indeed in NP. This is because the existence of such an NDTM implies that there is a polynomial-time verification algorithm for the problem. The non-deterministic guessing phase of the NDTM corresponds to the generation of a certificate, and the deterministic verification phase corresponds to the polynomial-time verification algorithm.
Further Considerations and Examples
To further elucidate this concept, let us consider additional examples of problems in NP and their relationship with NDTMs:
1. Hamiltonian Path Problem: Given a graph, the Hamiltonian Path problem asks whether there exists a path that visits each vertex exactly once. An NDTM can solve this problem in polynomial time by non-deterministically guessing a sequence of vertices and then verifying if the sequence forms a valid Hamiltonian path. The verification step involves checking the adjacency of consecutive vertices and ensuring that each vertex is visited exactly once, both of which can be done in polynomial time.
2. Subset Sum Problem: Given a set of integers and a target sum, the Subset Sum problem asks whether there exists a subset of the integers that sums to the target. An NDTM can solve this problem in polynomial time by non-deterministically guessing a subset of the integers and then verifying if the sum of the subset equals the target. The verification step involves summing the elements of the guessed subset, which can be done in polynomial time.
3. Graph Coloring Problem: Given a graph and a number of colors, the Graph Coloring problem asks whether it is possible to color the vertices of the graph such that no two adjacent vertices share the same color. An NDTM can solve this problem in polynomial time by non-deterministically assigning colors to the vertices and then verifying if the coloring is valid. The verification step involves checking the colors of adjacent vertices, which can be done in polynomial time.
Conclusion
In light of the definitions and examples provided, it is clear that a problem can indeed be in the NP complexity class if there exists a non-deterministic Turing machine that will solve it in polynomial time. This relationship is a cornerstone of computational complexity theory and underscores the equivalence between polynomial-time solvability by NDTMs and membership in the NP class.
Other recent questions and answers regarding Complexity:
- Is PSPACE class not equal to the EXPSPACE class?
- Is P complexity class a subset of PSPACE class?
- Can we can prove that Np and P class are the same by finding an efficient polynomial solution for any NP complete problem on a deterministic TM?
- Can the NP class be equal to the EXPTIME class?
- Are there problems in PSPACE for which there is no known NP algorithm?
- Can a SAT problem be an NP complete problem?
- NP is the class of languages that have polynomial time verifiers
- Are P and NP actually the same complexity class?
- Is every context free language in the P complexity class?
- Is there a contradiction between the definition of NP as a class of decision problems with polynomial-time verifiers and the fact that problems in the class P also have polynomial-time verifiers?
View more questions and answers in Complexity