NP is the class of languages that have polynomial time verifiers
The class NP, which stands for "nondeterministic polynomial time," is a fundamental concept in computational complexity theory, a subfield of theoretical computer science. To understand NP, one must first grasp the notion of decision problems, which are questions with a yes-or-no answer. A language in this context refers to a set of strings over some alphabet, where each string encodes an instance of a decision problem.
A language (L) is said to be in NP if there exists a polynomial-time verifier for (L). A verifier is a deterministic algorithm (V) that takes two inputs: an instance (x) and a certificate (y). The certificate (y) is also known as a "witness" or "proof." The verifier (V) checks whether the certificate (y) confirms that (x) belongs to the language (L). Formally, a language (L) is in NP if there exists a polynomial-time algorithm (V) and a polynomial (p(n)) such that for every string (x in L), there exists a string (y) with (|y| leq p(|x|)) and (V(x, y) = 1). Conversely, for every string (x notin L), there is no string (y) such that (V(x, y) = 1).
To elucidate this concept, consider the well-known problem of "Boolean satisfiability" (SAT). The SAT problem asks whether there exists an assignment of truth values to variables in a given Boolean formula such that the formula evaluates to true. The SAT problem is in NP because, given a Boolean formula ( phi ) and an assignment ( alpha ) of truth values to its variables, one can verify in polynomial time whether ( alpha ) satisfies ( phi ). Here, the instance ( x ) is the Boolean formula ( phi ), and the certificate ( y ) is the assignment ( alpha ). The verifier ( V ) checks whether ( alpha ) makes ( phi ) true, which can be done in polynomial time with respect to the size of ( phi ).
Another illustrative example is the "Hamiltonian Path" problem. This problem asks whether there exists a path in a given graph that visits each vertex exactly once. The Hamiltonian Path problem is also in NP because, given a graph ( G ) and a sequence of vertices ( P ), one can verify in polynomial time whether ( P ) is a Hamiltonian path in ( G ). In this case, the instance ( x ) is the graph ( G ), and the certificate ( y ) is the sequence of vertices ( P ). The verifier ( V ) checks whether ( P ) forms a Hamiltonian path, which can be done in polynomial time with respect to the size of ( G ).
The concept of polynomial-time verifiability is important because it provides a way to characterize problems that are efficiently checkable, even if finding the solution might be computationally infeasible. This leads to the famous question of whether ( P = NP ), which asks whether every problem whose solution can be verified in polynomial time can also be solved in polynomial time. The class ( P ) consists of decision problems that can be solved in polynomial time by a deterministic Turing machine. If ( P = NP ), it would mean that every problem with a polynomial-time verifier also has a polynomial-time solver. This question remains one of the most important open problems in computer science.
One of the key properties of NP is that it is closed under polynomial-time reductions. A polynomial-time reduction from a language ( L_1 ) to a language ( L_2 ) is a polynomial-time computable function ( f ) such that ( x in L_1 ) if and only if ( f(x) in L_2 ). If there exists a polynomial-time reduction from ( L_1 ) to ( L_2 ) and ( L_2 ) is in NP, then ( L_1 ) is also in NP. This property is instrumental in the study of NP-completeness, which identifies the "hardest" problems in NP. A problem is NP-complete if it is in NP and every problem in NP can be reduced to it in polynomial time. The SAT problem was the first problem proven to be NP-complete, and it serves as a basis for proving the NP-completeness of other problems.
To further illustrate the concept of polynomial-time verifiability, consider the "Subset Sum" problem. This problem asks whether there exists a subset of a given set of integers that sums to a specified target value. The Subset Sum problem is in NP because, given a set of integers ( S ), a target value ( t ), and a subset ( S' ) of ( S ), one can verify in polynomial time whether the sum of the elements in ( S' ) equals ( t ). Here, the instance ( x ) is the pair ( (S, t) ), and the certificate ( y ) is the subset ( S' ). The verifier ( V ) checks whether the sum of the elements in ( S' ) equals ( t ), which can be done in polynomial time with respect to the size of ( S ).
The importance of polynomial-time verifiability extends beyond theoretical considerations. In practical terms, it means that for problems in NP, if a proposed solution (certificate) is provided, it can be checked efficiently. This has significant implications for cryptographic protocols, optimization problems, and various fields where verifying the correctness of a solution is important.
To summarize, the class NP encompasses decision problems for which a proposed solution can be verified in polynomial time by a deterministic algorithm. This concept is foundational in computational complexity theory and has profound implications for both theoretical and practical aspects of computer science. The study of NP, polynomial-time verifiability, and related concepts such as NP-completeness continues to be a vibrant and critical area of research.
Other recent questions and answers regarding Complexity:
- Is PSPACE class not equal to the EXPSPACE class?
- Is P complexity class a subset of PSPACE class?
- Can we can prove that Np and P class are the same by finding an efficient polynomial solution for any NP complete problem on a deterministic TM?
- Can the NP class be equal to the EXPTIME class?
- Are there problems in PSPACE for which there is no known NP algorithm?
- Can a SAT problem be an NP complete problem?
- Can a problem be in NP complexity class if there is a non deterministic turing machine that will solve it in polynomial time
- Are P and NP actually the same complexity class?
- Is every context free language in the P complexity class?
- Is there a contradiction between the definition of NP as a class of decision problems with polynomial-time verifiers and the fact that problems in the class P also have polynomial-time verifiers?
View more questions and answers in Complexity